Journal: Molecular Pharmacology
Article Title: Teaching an Old Drug New Tricks: Agonism, Antagonism, and Biased Signaling of Pilocarpine through M3 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor
doi: 10.1124/mol.117.109678
Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of pilocarpine on PIP2 hydrolysis. Cells were cotransfected with the PIP2 red biosensor and with the plasmids encoding M1R or M3R. Fluorescence was recorded in real time after cell stimulation with pilocarpine (Pilo) or CCh. (A) Representative images of CHO-K1 cells cotransfected with plasmids to overexpress M3R and the PIP2 sensor. The cells were grown on coverslips and imaged under fluorescence microscope in a flow chamber. (B) Traces show the average of fluorescence response from 20 to 30 HEK293T cells; red trace is response of M1R-expressing cells, green trace is M3R-expressing cells, and black is cells expressing only the PIP2 biosensor. Cells were challenged with the flow of solutions of 100 μM Pilo or CCh at the indicated times. (C) PIP2 responses from CHO-K1 cells transfected with M1R (red) or M3R (green). Cells were stimulated with 100 μM pilocarpine, Oxo-M, or CCh. (D) PIP2 sensor fluorescence recorded from M3R-overexpressing HEK293 cells were first challenged with 25 μM CCh in the presence of 300 μM pilocarpine (red and black horizontal bars) and then washed and stimulated again with 25 μM CCh (black bars). (E) Ca2+ responses from HEK293 cells expressing M3R (green) or control plasmid (black). Cells were stimulated with the mixture of pilocarpine and CCh or CCh alone, as in (D).
Article Snippet: We used a protein sensor that increases its fluorescence upon binding of PIP2 (Montana Molecular, Bozeman, MT).
Techniques: Fluorescence, Cell Stimulation, Microscopy, Expressing, Transfection, Control, Plasmid Preparation